View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Fri Jul 28, 2017 10:51 am



Reply to topic  [ 161 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 13, 14, 15, 16, 17  Next
next big plane... 
Author Message

Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2017 11:45 am
Posts: 4
Reply with quote
RE: Osprey

I'm sure Milviz could rise up to the challenge. Again, it would be a monumental addition.
Skyspin


Tue Mar 07, 2017 12:47 pm
Profile

Joined: Tue May 24, 2011 8:37 pm
Posts: 124
Location: Wichita Falls, Texas, USA
Reply with quote
I doubt they'll do it. The problem is that the amount of programming required would be on the order of Accusim or PMDG's background stuff because FSX does NOT support tilt-rotor operations. All flight models are "derivative" in FSX. This means you set one of a predetermined "base" models (i.e. jet, prop, turboprop, helicopter) and then adjust the flight model to "perform" like the plane you're building. Because of this, it's not possible to have a "plane" hover or a "helicopter" to fly at high speeds.

What you'd have to do is create a way to either swap between the two models (helicopter and flight) or create a wholly external flight model that can operate in both regimes and feed the information into FSX (which is much of what A2A's Accusim does). Either one is a very large investment in programming time and I suspect one beyond any reasonable price point.


Thu Mar 09, 2017 7:00 pm
Profile
Site Admin

Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 3:18 pm
Posts: 8494
Reply with quote
It's not just that... it's that it would be for, really, a select few and it's not financially viable in that way.

_________________
Creative Director and chooser of planes.


Thu Mar 09, 2017 7:14 pm
Profile

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2017 9:57 pm
Posts: 10
Location: Florida
Reply with quote
The question really is, who (how many) would buy the Osprey. I personally would for the challenge of flying it. I can imagine that, if sufficient people were interested, the development efforts would be worth it. I have faith in Milviz's ability to deliver the usual quality product.

My 2 cents.

Blue

_________________
Image
BLUE ZONE VIDEO CHANNEL - BLUE ZONE Community on Facebook
BLUE ZONE Group image & Video Sharing


Thu Mar 09, 2017 7:35 pm
Profile WWW
Site Admin

Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 3:18 pm
Posts: 8494
Reply with quote
Honestly, I would be surprised if many did buy it... unless it was relatively inexpensive. That not being possible, it's unlikely it would do better than an equivalently priced ATR... which is the next big plane...

_________________
Creative Director and chooser of planes.


Thu Mar 09, 2017 9:14 pm
Profile

Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2010 7:38 pm
Posts: 6740
Reply with quote
There is also a very good MV-22B freeware coming out on FSDeveloper although it is not quite to the standard of Milviz payware.

_________________
-JB

Milviz R&D Lab dev/Resident PITA Perfectionist.


Image
Please read the manual before posting. You will learn quicker than if I act as your instructor.


Fri Mar 10, 2017 9:25 am
Profile

Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2017 10:36 pm
Posts: 18
Reply with quote
Late to the party here as well, but for what it's worth...

Gonna echo a couple of the posters here; would love to see the following from MilViz:
F-111/FB-111 (can't really overstate this one, I'm flying the Virtavia version, but I'm certain MilViz can do a better job)
F-105 (as above really)
As mentioned in a question today, in another thread, I'd really like to see an A-10C (C!, possibly A as well, maybe even the A-10B N/AW even if it's just a "could have been", but mostly the C-version) from MilViz

If talking really big (or at least bigger) stuff, there is one aircraft I'd really love to see MilViz do, and that is the B-1B. Once again, I'm flying the Virtavia version, and while fun and interesting in its own right, once again I'm sure MilViz can do a better job. I'm sure there are tons of details that cannot be implemented due to being classified, but much of the flight dynamics and those systems that are out in the open already could be implemented to make a very rewarding and interesting package. For all I know I might be the only one who gets my noodle tickled by that aircraft, but I'll say as much that me getting into FSX last year, was spurred on by wanting to fly THAT specific aircraft. Everything else I've bought and flown with after that, has been a byproduct of getting into flight-sims again due to wanting to fly that one aircraft ;)


Fri May 05, 2017 1:16 pm
Profile

Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2016 10:33 pm
Posts: 1
Reply with quote
727-100C!


Tue Jul 11, 2017 7:08 pm
Profile

Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2017 10:36 pm
Posts: 18
Reply with quote
Sailor wrote:
I'd like to see an A6E Intruder. Long serving plane for the fleet. Most fsx models of it are wanting.


I know, I know, you have a lot of aircraft in the pipe for the next couple of years.
But Sailor got a point here. While I do have the two A-6 packages that are available for FSX, they do leave a lot to be desired, to put it mildly. The systems modeling and visuals is simply nowhere near MilViz standards. Even yesterday, I "tweaked" one of the packages for my own use, to get rid of the "Nickelodeon-look" graphics on one of the cockpit displays. And I never do that, with any other aircraft. But the current A-6 alternatives ticks me off...

If there is one aircraft that really would benefit from some MilViz love, it is the A-6 Intruder/EA-6B Prowler.
Getting an A-6A/B/E/EA-6B package(s) on par with what you've done with the Phantom would be glorious. Even "just" ONE model (I would go for the A-6E TRAM). An aircraft that is screaming for TacPak integration, if there ever was one.

Simply a wonderful aircraft, spanning multiple conflicts and theaters, from Viet Nam to Bosnia. I can remember it from numerous winter exercises in Norway, doing live bombing training into the live fire ranges. It even stayed in active service 1 year longer than the F-4 (EA-6B Prowler exception, it stayed on until 2015, and I personally saw one up close in 2007, with desert camo livery at Baghram airbase in Afghanistan).
So many nice systems that could (possibly/hopefully) be modeled; an all-weather attack aircraft with numerous different radar systems over the years, the A-6E with TRAM, the DIANE system, the A-6B "Iron Hand" setup, A-6C with "Black Crow" and TRIM-pod and LLTV...oh my!

I'm sure it would be a monumental undertaking, but if there is anyone who I think could do it, it would be MilViz. It's asking a lot, to be sure, but for the love of Leroy Grumman, someone has to do it ;)
...and what's not to like about an aircraft that even has its own movie... :)


Tue Jul 18, 2017 10:31 am
Profile

Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2010 7:38 pm
Posts: 6740
Reply with quote
If you can get hold of a set of manuals for the TRAM/SWIP.....

_________________
-JB

Milviz R&D Lab dev/Resident PITA Perfectionist.


Image
Please read the manual before posting. You will learn quicker than if I act as your instructor.


Tue Jul 18, 2017 11:09 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 161 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 13, 14, 15, 16, 17  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot] and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.